Edit - History - Print
Recent Changes - Search

ENGL 3179/5179: Elements of E-Rhetoric
M C Morgan
Dept of English
Bemidji State University

Elements Home

Projects

Participants

Reference

Related Courses

BSU Bypass


AboutThisWiki
pmwiki-2.0.beta54
Index
AllRecentChanges
Documentation Index
rss feed

pmwiki.org
edit SideBar

Elements > Spam2005GroupB

Categories

Description

Messages from all of the categories tend to grab the reader's attention right away, through one of two ways:

  • bright, dominating visuals with a minimal amount of text--one glance is sufficent to take it all in
  • a minimal amount of text with no visuals--the entire message can be read in less than a minute

Various methods of content/sentence structure are also present:

  • question and answer (Do you need it? We have it...)
  • Short, directive sentences (Buy now and Save!)
  • Longer explanations (Our company has discovered blank, which has led us to the conclusion that you blah, blah, blah...)

The messages also include some authoritative name, position, etc.

  • Familiar brand-names
  • An "official"-looking company name (Blah Blah Blah Inc.)
  • A "personal" signature of a company director, doctor, etc.

Analysis

Question: How do the various "categories" of spam create credibility through Ethos, Pathos, and Logos -- and what does this reflect about the way spam approaches its audience?

Ethos:

  • Official looking names and popular brands are used to convince consumers they are credible and to attract them to their websites
    • knock-off brand names are used to remind audience of an official brand name, recognizable but not quite discernable
  • Images are also used create credibility (look professional)

Logos:

  • the audience must draw the conclusion that these observations are believable, credible
  • the direct, almost commanding nature of some of the messages (Act Now!) can, through a sense of urgengy, lead the audience to reason that it is important to act now, take advantage of the worthwhile offer
  • playing off of pathos, it's also up to the audience to reason that the rhetor is concerned for them aware of their needs, etc
  • By showing the audience a good-looking image of the offer it makes it tangible/reasonable--if they see it they can believe it
  • Loaded language (both positive and negative) ("savvy", "impossibly good", "bland", "tasteless", "spicy", perceived brand-names) in association with the presense or absence of the product creates a line of reasoning wherein if the audience buys into the message they are part of the "savvy" crowd, if not they are still in the "bland, tasteless" world

Pathos:

  • The authoritative tone of many of the rhetors appeals to a sense of security for the audience
  • The use of images in many work to reassure the audience--since they can see it (and believe it), they're safe in acting upon the message
  • The nature of many of the offers, ads, etc. creates a sense of concern for the audience, appeals to their ego by creating an appearance of inclusion in a select group (upper-class consumers, etc.), and appeals to their sense of self-worth by indicating a succesful choice,etc. on the part of the audience if they make use of/pursue/purchase a worthwhile offer
    • loaded language appeals to emotions--the line of reasoning mentioned under logos can lead the audience to a feeling of inclusion, acceptance, promotion
  • The abrupt, direct, time-sensitive nature of many messages creates a sense of urgency or fear on the part of the audience--they don't want to miss out on something good

Edit - History - Print - Recent Changes - Search
Page last modified on October 11, 2005, at 10:44 AM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0.

PmWiki can't process your request

Cannot acquire lockfile

We are sorry for any inconvenience.